<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZNet &#124;Ecology &#124; Who&#8217;s Paying?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/</link>
	<description>News And Views From The Left</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/#comment-11230</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/#comment-11230</guid>
		<description>Our PM has also publicly questioned the “science” of climate change. Apparently, the consensus of the entire international scientific community is of little meaning when a trained economist has doubts. 

Although the PC website criticizes the Liberals for not meeting the Kyoto protocols, he recently stated that climate change is an  "emerging science" and added: "If, back in the mid 1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary."  

We are now to assume that what was Liberal mediocrity is now good Cartesian skepticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our PM has also publicly questioned the “science” of climate change. Apparently, the consensus of the entire international scientific community is of little meaning when a trained economist has doubts. </p>
<p>Although the PC website criticizes the Liberals for not meeting the Kyoto protocols, he recently stated that climate change is an  &#8220;emerging science&#8221; and added: &#8220;If, back in the mid 1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.&#8221;  </p>
<p>We are now to assume that what was Liberal mediocrity is now good Cartesian skepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Kitty. Some blog :: Balearic shearwaters and global warming :: September :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/#comment-11155</link>
		<dc:creator>Dear Kitty. Some blog :: Balearic shearwaters and global warming :: September :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftnews.org/archives/2006/09/28/8735/#comment-11155</guid>
		<description>[...] “More than a hundred were recorded off Berry Head in South Devon in just one day this month – which is a significant proportion of the world population,” said RSPB Conservation Officer, Helen Booker. Exxon&#8217;s pseudo-science on global warming: here.     2 Comments &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “More than a hundred were recorded off Berry Head in South Devon in just one day this month – which is a significant proportion of the world population,” said RSPB Conservation Officer, Helen Booker. Exxon&#8217;s pseudo-science on global warming: here.     2 Comments &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
