A tale of two student lobby groups.
I couldn’t believe the article when I read it. This report calls for the curtailment of student aid, grants, and tax breaks in order that they be targeted at poor students, all the while allowing tuition to keep increasing. It’s good to see that the Canadian Federation of Students are on this. Canadian Alliance of Student Associations’ response seems a little mild if you ask me.
Here is Canadian Alliance of Student Associations’ response to the report:
Students Urge Focus on Entire Post-Secondary System
July 24, 2006
(Ottawa, ON) While a report released today by the Educational Policy Institute (EPI) warns of a looming crisis in Canada’s financial aid system, students also urge the government to focus on the overall state of education in Canada.
“The report addresses important issues such as the emphasis on unfocused post-secondary education funding by governments in the form of tax credits and savings programs. As the report states, grants for students in high need and for those from low income backgrounds are important for the affordability of post-secondary education, such as those provided by the Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation. However, we must also consider the bigger picture,” said Phillippe Ouellette, National Director of the Canadian Alliance of Student Associations (CASA).
While CASA believes that it is of utmost importance to provide funding [read more student loans] for students from low-income backgrounds, it is essential to consider other funding factors such as institutional funding and rising fees. Students from separate demographics, such as those from middle-income families face similar difficulties, receiving inadequate aid and graduating with an average crippling debt load of over 30,000, when considering interest paid.
“An important factor in providing fair and balanced funding for Canadians from all backgrounds is a truly pan-Canadian approach to education. The federal and provincial governments must work together to eliminate disparities that currently exist by developing a Pan-Canadian Accord on post-secondary education. This must be complimented by a dedicated post-secondary funding transfer from the federal government to the provinces. It is through the collaboration of federal and provincial governments that we can ensure a system of increasing accessibility and affordability,” added Mr. Ouellette.
—————————————————————————————-
This is the Canadian Federation of Students’ response
Tuition Fees Are The Real Time Bomb
Canadian Federation of Students, OTTAWA, 24 Jul 06
A study released today by the Educational Policy Institute attempts to distort the legitimate pressures placed on Canada’s student financial aid system to justify tuition fee increases. The study is misleading and intended to influence the Premiers before their meeting this week, according to the Canadian Federation of Students.
“This isn’t research. This is a public relations campaign against affordable public education,” said Amanda Aziz, National Chairperson of the Canadian Federation of Students.
The study, titled The Student Aid Time Bomb, attacks tuition fee regulation simply because all students benefit from low fees. The authors argue that poor Canadians actually benefit from unregulated tuition fees because such a policy frees up government funding to create more grants. The study ignores the fact that tuition fee increases over the past decade are the primary force driving up the costs associated with delivering student financial aid.
The EPI’s report also ignores a well-known study into tuition fee regulation by economist Hugh MacKenzie. Contrary to the unsupported assertions in Time Bomb, MacKenzie found that tuition fee freezes are a progressive allocation of public funding in support of access for low- and middle-income families.
Instead of pitting the regulation of fees against the disbursement of aid, the Canadian Federation of Students argues a balanced approach is required. Tuition fees must be reduced from their current levels, and assistance must be available for those with legitimate financial need.
“Students and anti-poverty groups have long understood the importance of reducing tuition fees for improving access to post-secondary education,” said Aziz. “Student aid can only be effective if it is delivered in an environment where fees aren’t skyrocketing. The authors of this study fail to understand that simple fact.”